We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

    • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Alright, so I have had Jellyfin installed for years now, but my primary issue is that most devices myself or my users use lack official, readily-available clients. For example, the Samsung TV app is a developer mode install. Last I looked, nobody has put a build into the store.

      I really want to use Jellyfin, but I feel like my users simply can’t. I’m interested in others’ experiences here that could help.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I give all my friends the choice between Plex and jellyfin (I run both containers side by side pointed to the same media folders) and they all invariably choose Plex. I think it has a lot to do with the jellyfin UI, and I think an overhaul like jellyfin-vue or something that looks like findroid needs to happen in order for jellyfin to really appeal to regular people.

          • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            No idea what Flatpak is, much? Jellyfin is open-source. If your distro isn’t providing you a .deb or tarball to your liking, that’s not on the Jellyfin project.

            • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Why would you ever bother to use either option when you can just access it via the WebUI on Firefox?

              • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                2 months ago

                Because that basically requires transcoding for modern codecs. H265? Transcode. Subtitles? Transcode. The JF client on the same hardware can usually direct play.

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh fair enough, I’d highly recommend enabling transcoding anyway it just eliminates all sorts of issues like this.

              • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Don’t ask me? I’ll ftp before I’ll WebUI like so, but for online viewing, I’ll take streaming please. My kids, wife, and mother-in-law find that a million times more convenient.

                Meanwhile, there’s a dude in these comments hating on the notion that Jellyfin’s app will download the Raw file for offline viewing purposes. Please, do not ask me to pretend to care what is going on in that person’s head. In my world, using VLC to play my files is a perk. Gimme that yummy 2x or slow-mo as I see fit, please.

                • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I use Findroid for its great UI but also its ability to download and watch offline. It’s a better experience and I was surprised Jellyfin Android didn’t support it.

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  WebUI is streaming though on desktops though and I assume they’re also using iOS/Android/TV which all have clients, so I’m trying to get at the difference there.

                  • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I thought their implication was that they would use the WebUI for downloading videos for offline watching later. Beyond that, I don’t really know or care; Their suggestion was weird to me, but I took it at face value and replied accordingly.

          • Luci@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            Flatpaks aren’t the worst, at least it’s not a snap only

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t ever connect a “smart” tv to the internet. It’s only going to become shit and steal your data.

        Raspberry Pi, old pc or any kind of other external player will always be better for connectivity and control.

        • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree, but having looked down this road, finding a quality external player that users will understand and is inexpensive is … not easy.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          While I agree with you 100% and every tv in my home is under this mantra I get where the parent comment is coming from. Family members and friends visiting have asked about access to my Jellyfin library and they aren’t necessarily keen on buying additional hardware, aren’t willing to educate themselves on setting up options that would be objectively better for connectivity, privacy, control, etc.

          They just want an app in their TVs app store. It’s convenient and easy. I disagree with them but I don’t blame them. It’s human nature to go for the option that results in expending the least amount of effort. But then they don’t get my sweet Jellyfin library. If you cant run the client or kodi then I can’t help you, sorry.

      • Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        A Chromecast TV device might fill your gap. There is a jellyfin android TV build in the app store and it works with every TV. Just costs about 50 dollarydoos

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            True and while they are both enshitifying their services. Somehow in this one area Google seems to be going slower. And making slightly less bonehead moves

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I had the same experience with my parents. They have a Samsung TV and the Jellyfin experience was awful.

        I ended up getting them a little N100 mini pc and installed Bazzite and the Jellyfin app from Flathub. You can configure it so it knows it’s on a TV, and responds to keyboard controls. I got them a remote from a company called Pepper Jobs that gives keyboard input and now they have a great experience with it. Even my mom, who’s a big technophobe, loves it.

        My dad also has an LG TV in his workshop that doesn’t have a working Jellyfin app (cause it’s ten years old), and he uses the Jellyfin app for his Xbox on that one.

      • blue_skull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I use Jellyfin client on my new Samsung TV via a Google TV dongle (ONN tv, $25 at Walmart). Seems to work well.

        My only complaint is the stream volume has been very low after a recent update. Downsampling helps but seems like it shouldn’ t be necessary.

        • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve got a Samsung TV and am nearly a complete Luddite (in the colloquial sense).

          I managed to install the Jellyfin app on my TV just by following the step by step instructions on a website

      • Kekin@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can speak from my experience with an Apple TV, the application “Infuse” works amazing with a jellyfin server. Though the application is essentially $1 month subscription, but works across all your apple devices, if you have any. I think it’s worth it.

        Additionally, the official app for Android TV worked pretty well when I last tried it on an Nvidia Shield

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I love Jellyfin, but I always find something that I have a problem with when trying it, for example it has weak searching, tagging, and TV show identification compared to Plex.

        I tried using it even as recent as yesterday for some searching and tagging, but it’s searching, tagging, and even TV show identification has problems and is weak in comparison to Plex. I couldn’t mass-tag certain videos which was annoying for me, I had to do it one-by-one and it ended up taking a long time, that was frustrating. Also, tags don’t show up in searches anymore because it hurts performance apparently. With that said, maybe Plex has the same limitation, but it doesn’t mean that Jellyfin has to. They are open-source, and they can be better than Plex, and in many ways they already are, but I keep running into pain points with how I want to use it, and it does feel a bit unfortunate. With that said, I’m a developer too, so I know it’s not always that simple. It’s just in some ways it feels less “complete” than Plex.

        I’m still really pleased with Jellyfin though, and especially the future potential of it.

      • Chris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve never had an issue with the apps. It’s on my Chromecast and my android phone, and I typically stream to the TV from my phone.

        My only issue is that they require a real cert (which is good tbh) and I am having trouble getting letsencrypt working due to my isp blocking port 80 and me dragging my feet getting DNS working

    • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      any recommendations to get it to work remotely? the good thing about plex was it was easy to set up, but the quality was medicore.

        • gdog05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          I used a Cloudflare tunnel for security (no open ports) but that’s for people with limited tech ability mostly. Everyone else I’ve got connected with a tailscale node.

          • Grunt4019@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            Careful with that I think it’s against their TOS to do that due to the large volumes of data video streaming takes.

          • jayb151@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m in the process of moving houses at the moment. But I’ve already got a nice PC put together to host a mess of services. Should be “fun” LOL

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That works but is pretty insecure as you have nothing protecting your server outside of a basic password.

          • jayb151@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m pleading full ignorance here. Because I opened the port for JF, doesn’t that mean the only thing exposed would be my jellyfin? I thought having the rest of my ports closed would not allow access to the rest of my system?

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve been testing out jellyfin for the last couple months but it doesn’t really fill the void of this specific feature that’s being locked behind a pay wall. If anyone has good recommendations for securely and reliably hosting jellyfin behind SSL and auth with email password resets where I don’t have to worry about it as much as Plex.

      I use jellyfin locally but for a handful of remote clients I have I may well block off their access they’re not going to be able to figure out my hand spun services and wall of text.

          • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            In case this helps as a reference point, I use a $5 digital ocean droplet as my Plex and Jellyfin reverse proxy and it seems to handle the traffic of 3-5 simultaneous streams just fine. I use Haproxy in tcp mode (so no http interpreting, just passing packets) in an attempt to keep the CPU load minimal and just make it a pure I/O task.

            • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              i’m fairly familiar with reverse proxies and how to set them up, but I’m mostly worried about the monthly bandwidth limits here. especially with hetzner’s recently lowered limits. since I have a life time plex pass i might be able to hold off from switching until I figure something else out, at least.

              • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Gotcha, I’ve never actually considered the bandwidth limits. It looks like digitalocean includes 1TB per month and I used 242GB last month. If I ever get close to the limit I will just spin up another droplet. I don’t think I would even need to load balance unless the first one is struggling since the bandwidth allowance across all droplets is pooled together.

                If you aren’t already using a reverse proxy, then do you currently just port forward or use the Plex relay? The only reason I use one is because of CGNAT. Before I moved to a place with only CGNAT I port forwarded for both Plex and Jellyfin.

                • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I just port forward right now, so Plex’s system is basically an overpowered dynamic dns. I guess my next option is to self host a dynamic dns on a numbered xyz domain (yk the $1/yr ones)

        • deeferg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dumb question but should there be VPNs operating on both ends, server and client? Or just the client because I’m guessing the server might change the connection address.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            A VPN Server on the server or home network (look into PiVPN for instance), and a VPN Client on clients (look at openvpn for instance).

            Good luck and let me know if you have any further questions - I’m more than happy to answer!

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Authentik + jellyfin SSO plugin?

        I haven’t tried it out personally, but I use authentik, for that you can just create a password policy, then add a new stage for identification (just make sure to add the email field), and an email stage, then create a flow.

        More work on your end than paying someone else obviously.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Before now I was on the sunk cost fallacy of not wanting to teach my extended family how to use Jellyfin instead of plex but after this I’m already mid-way through setting up a Jellyfin docker container on my server and I only found out an hour ago

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jellyfin is still way behind Plex in general performance but I keep a VM of it running and updated, for when the day comes that Plex is absolutely worthless.

      Which at this rate, is, well, we’re getting there.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Alas my TV (LG WebOS 2) doesn’t have an application for Jellyfin, or I’d have switched years ago :-(

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is there an emby app available or Kodi? The base of Jellyfin should work in either. Plug and play as far as I’m aware with maybe some issues for certain versions.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Jellyfin depends on proprietary Microsoft .NET, even on Linux.

      It’s still better than Plex and Emby, which are fully proprietary, and have no source code. But I will stick with sshfs with kodi, and nginx plus mpv for now.