Decky Power Tools already offers this, and I believe there’s a desktop setting for it as well. Still very nice to have though.

  • ITeeTechMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 month ago

    While this is nice, I do hope they consider making it easier to remove and install a new battery for the next iteration of the steam deck.

    To clarify, I mean something similar to phones where the backplate can slide off or preferably a panel, secured by a screw, when removed allows direct access to the battery and allows it to be easily swapped out - similar to many kids toys.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair, most phones don’t have easily replaceable batteries anymore either. I remember in an interview that one of the steam deck leads said they really wanted an easier to replace battery, but it was a compromise they ended up making. I think they blamed it partially on inexperience with hardware production, and that they hoped to do better on future hardware.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      29 days ago

      If the Steam Deck’s airflow wasn’t so delicately balanced, they could probably just skip the glue and add some foam or rubber patchs on the corners to prevent rattling. Then it’d be fairly easy to replace.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Nice I didn’t know power tools has this, I will configure that when I get home today. I often leave my deck plugged in and forget about it and charging the battery to 100% is no bueno

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Would definitely be really nice since we tend to leave our Steam Decks plugged in all day

    • .Donuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      Yeah I don’t get it either. Just make 80% the new 100%, and if someone wants to get the most capacity as a “power user” (no pun intended), they can manually switch to a capacity of 120% at the warning that this will decrease battery life time.

      This way, it’s opt-out instead of opt-in.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Mmm i wouldn’t go that far on most devices, most of the time that would result in unsatisfying runtime.

        however for devices where they can easily run days on a charge, yeah it makes sense. My xiaomi smartwatch gets 6 fucking days on 70% charge with quite a lot of power-drawing features enabled, so there’s really no reason to ever charge it above 80%.

        But on my phone i very much need to be able to charge it to 100% before travelling, it only gets like 16h with the screen off on a full charge.

        • .Donuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Your phone only last 16 hours and that’s with the screen off? I think you need to check your phone, because that’s not normal. Your phone should be able to last a full day or two.

          But on my phone i very much need to be able to charge it to 100% before travelling

          Yeah, so at that point you opt-in to the “overcharge” (just to make it look scary!) method of charging 100%

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      28 days ago

      My iPhone battery has survived a surprising amount of time, and I’m going to guess that’s because of Apple imposing its own researched limits on battery charging based on what it sees from my usage.

      That could mean it’s sometimes lying when it says it’s at “100%”.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would like this since I mostly play plugged in, but I would like easily swappable batteries even more. If they were hot-swappable, that would be even better!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    That’s how all rechargeable batteries work isn’t it? If I understand correctly, there’s no such thing as 100% because it would break it.

    Is the change here that they’re letting the user set the limit?

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      not quite, there is a 100% and there is a true 0%, but going above 4.2V or below 3.7V damages the battery’s capacity incredibly fast, so it’s better to avoid those by setting 100% to 4.2 and 0% to 3.7 (also because that’s the interval where most of the energy is stored) (Talking about Li-ion here)

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    My Samsung phone does this and it drives me crazy. i wish they’d lie about the laat 20% they’re keeping free and just show me at a full charge

    • ByteWelder@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Alternatively, they could just charge to 80% and show that it is 80% charged, like iOS and macOS do.

      edit: I seemed to have misread the comment above. It’s useful to not be lied too, in my opinion, because then you still have the option to charge to 100% when needed.

      • keyez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that’s what it’s already doing. That’s how my wife’s Samsung operates