We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would be quite small now?
We really need to get past the 1080p barrier. AFAICS there is one economical KVM solution for that, and several costly enterprise kits. Surely the actual hardware cost/difference per-unit would be quite small now?
Sounds like you might want the “-AlwaysShared” option of Xvnc. Ref: https://tigervnc.org/doc/Xvnc.html
TrueNAS scale helps a lot, as it makes many popular apps just a few clicks away. Or for more power-users, stuff like the linux cockpit also really helps.
To directly answer your questions…
Move over Scottish lord scheme, now you can own a bit of torrent!
And so the straight-jacket tightens a bit more…
Strange… I’m pretty sure this was the second or third thing I tried, and I remember it not working (as in it caused it to crash with an obscure error message reminiscent of nested virtualization). Perhaps I’ll try it again.
It would be nice if Lutris had a “no internet” option, but i did not see such an option
IIRC, they have been bought out in the last decade.
Zim.
Assuming your old router might survive as an access point, maybe consider a Protectli FW2B? https://protectli.com/product-comparison/
0: “i don’t care about my data.”
1: “i REALLY care about my data”
5: “i’ll trade you one drive now, for my data if one of the drives dies later”
Very freedom-respecting. Probably the only consumer NAS vendor with instructions on how to install linux (bare-metal) on the official wiki. Their x86 boxen are 90% normal pc… with the remaining 10% being a bit nuisance.
Thank you for the value and your service to the community. Having an Infinity clone made it so much easier to switch to Lemmy!
Because sometimes I would rather things be slow than blurry, and my workstation monitor is >1080p.