Bonus if it can edit .sc files, a-la the best spreadsheet editor, sc-im.

Hugo isn’t a server, per se. It’s basically just a template engine. It was originally focused on turning markdown into web pages, with some extra functionality around generating indexes and cross-references that are really what set it apart from just a simple rendering engine. And by now, much of its value is in the huge number of site templates built for Hugo. But what Hugo does is takes some metadata, whatever markdown content you have, and it generates a static web site. You still need a web server pointed at the generated content. You run Hugo on demand to regenerate the site whenever there’s new content (although, there is a “watch” mode, where it’ll watch for changes and regenerate the site in response). It’s a little fancier than that; it doesn’t regenerate content that hasn’t changed. You can have it create whatever output format you want - mine generates both HTML and gmi (Gemini) sites from the same markdown. But that’s it: at its core, it’s a static site template rendering engine.

It is absolutely suitable for creating a portfolio site. Many of the templates are indeed such. And it’s not hard to make your own templates, if you know the front-end technologies.

It depends on how you want to write. If you want to use a web interface, WriteFreely is decent. If you like your text editor, Hugo is fantastic.

:shrug:

It’s trivial to host yourself, and super light on resources. Personally, I don’t use it; for blogging I write markdown and rsync it over to the server where Hugo picks it up and turns it into a blog. Now that I think about it, I should probably go shut my WriteFreely down. I have a few pages on it, but I hate web app interfaces, so I didn’t put much content in it.

Sourcehut is for-profit. You pay them to host your data, to provide public access, to run mailng lists, to run CI build servers… you’re paying for the services. But the source code is OSS; you can download and run your own services, all or just a few. The “paying them to host the software for you” isn’t the issue, right? It’s not that someone is charging for hosting and maintenance (and, ultimately, salaries for the people working on the software), but whether or not the software is free, and whether you can self-host.

I like your point about finding repos. I think it’d behoove all of the bit players to band together to provide one big searchable repo list. Heck, even I, who hates github with a smoldering passion, have enough sense to go there first to search for software; that’s just the nature of a hegemony. The stumbling of the attempt to create a common VCS hosting API (ForgeFed) is lamentable, but getting adoption would have been a uphill battle even without the rumored in-fighting and drama.

True, good catch.

I’m sure you’re right.

Just FYI, despite what media companies would like you to believe, making copies of media you own for your own use is not piracy. It’s allowed by law under fair use.

Docker of one version of software that uses Linux containers to encapsulate software and that software’s dependencies, while limiting that software’s access to the underlying OS. It’s chroot, but for more of the system. It can make running software that has a lot of moving parts and dependencies easier. It can also improve your security running that software.

For how-tos, watch one of the 875,936 YouTube tutorials, or read one of the 3 million text tutorials. Or ask ChatGPT, if you really need hand-holding.

I’ve only used my GL.iNet router with Mullvad, and I assume you’re going through the manual configuration for WireGuard part of the UI? Have you found the scan qr/upload config/manual input config part? From as far as I’ve tried it, it’s like setting up any WireGuard endpoint - you have to give it the same sort of config file you’d give wg-quick, including subnet, hosts, etc - the same place you’d put your pk.

Generate the config file on a different computer and upload it through the UI.

Piracy, not privacy.

In my defense, it was my last comment of the night, on my phone. I thought I was answering the otheg c/. Oh, well.

I want self-sovereign identity. I want to control who gets what information about me from my ID, and how that data is hosted. I’m aware that there are some really hostile attitudes about blockchain, but I’d like if a public blockchain could be used to host the information, so that the identity info could be decentralized and decoupled from any given provider.

I want control of my digital identity back, dammit.

postscript someone kindly pointed out this is c/piracy, not c/privacy, which I thought it was. Off topic; my bad.

No solution for you, but it’s a great idea, and I’ll be watching this space.

“Cheap” being relative, I think GL.iNet products are reasonably priced, and their software is OpenWRT with a customized web interface. $40 for their small, portable WiFi 5 Opal; $95 for their WiFi 6 “home” router; $130 for the WiFi 6 Opal. The Opals work fine for covering a 1br apartment, but have 2 eth ports. The bigger one (Flint?) has 4.

You know, I have no idea about flashing ability.

I missed the “ethernet only” part, sorry! I just buy Netgear routers, but they’re all unmamaged so relatively dumb.

I love these GL.iNet products (their portable models are fantastic, too). Runs OpenWRT, built in support for Mullvad (both OpenVPN and Wireguard), reasonably priced; fantastic kit.

Yeah, these are what I was imagining when I posted my comment, only I couldn’t find any good looking ones. Thanks for the product names!

Ah thanks! These are the only ZWave I have that does this - I’ll check that!

I have a couple of these Zooz Z-Wave water detectors. They were recognized by zwave2js, and easy to set up and test. My only issue is that I get triggers from them whenever the Z-Wave network changes - like, when I add new devices, I get an alarm from them.

They’re tiny - like the size of an old box of (matchstick) matches. If they were cheaper, If put one under every sink.

Too late! They’re already here!