![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
Installs are nothing. Fork it. Improve it. Even better if original devs would still contribute.
Installs are nothing. Fork it. Improve it. Even better if original devs would still contribute.
Yes the availability will remain an issue but at least I imagine that solving other issues could make it less serious.
More specifically, the issue (a feature too but still) with torrents is how spread they are. It’s difficult to know what is available and in what condition. There are dozens if not hundreds private trackers etc. This all makes it more likely for new torrents for the same content to be created multiple times, and overall seeding resources to be spread out across multiple versions of the same things. Some centralized public index might have helped everyone find things faster and prolong those things’ availability as the result. What such an index might need to stay damage-proof and useful is unrelated to this discussion, but I imagine it might work as some blockchain and thus may not require much in terms of resources.
I didn’t mean syncthing itself but some theoretical derivative that would have relevant features.
It would help to involve a kind of software infrastructure where users would choose how much resources (mostly disk space) they are willing to give in order to contribute to the overall availability of stuff.
A different, better protocol for sharing. Torrent is cool but files on it tend to die off, and also can’t be updated. I’m thinking something like syncthing might be the future.
Well I never touched sidebery css. Just using the default visual settings while the browser is in night mode. Looks good enough to me.
Ditched it for sidebery. So much less laggy now.
Did someone think about backing up the commit history? I believe it can be useful for future devs.