Well ente means “mine”
Well ente means “mine”
Thoose given are distrubution channels, but there are group chats like t.me/durovschat which is 12k members. I forgot the limits which i think is 200k for chatroom and infinite(?) for distrubution channels
Edit: yeah its 200k and infinite in “broadcast groups”
Searx is good enough?
EU seeders!
Try metas llama models. You probably triedd GPT 2.x
Btw what are thoose 1300 “banned” ones?
Again i’m having abiguity with works. I mean it shows as ampersand gt semicolon and not a single symbol for me. Are you reffering the same? Is it showing a single > symbol for you?
Lmao. But quotes won’t change anything i guess. But monospace should do or you maybe able to escape the characters with backslash \
Lemme try >
Edit : yeah this works for me.
Correctly or wrongly? yours renders ampersand gt semocolon as > only in code block and not in my sentence?
Wow so can I use > to get this?
Edit:yes
Actually i don’t know the full form. So just joked about it
I - ANAL
haha
Hhuh? Open source is not free. Its entirely different ideology. You can’t call it open source. Also open source have this same issue that people perveive it as software with “source availiable”. Is that dumb mnemonics? I think not!
People cannot understand a “new” ideology from the name itself. Hence they have to define it and popularise it. Free takes meaning in context and they have to make context in terms of software as free as in freedom.
Unrestricted or permissive does not look good to me. Free software can have restrictive licensing, like GPL. It has restriction which makes free software always free. You really know there are so called “permissive” licenses which do not have this. The word free shows the importance of freedom in sodtware which other terms fails to address
FSF DO NOT try to define free as in freedom as only meaning of free. But in context of software, free software means Libre. That is the point. And of course in english free takes context dependent meaning,and software can be either type of free. So it should be rigorously defined.
Anyway I can’t find synonyms for theese two free in english, what are they?
FOSS is Free AND Open Source Software what tf?
GNUamp
Original owner cam have control with GPL, that is control that someone else does not make it proprietary. This relies on copyright. Many open licenses have attribution requirement, which means derivative works should credit whoever contributed to it. So it is indeed ownership but pte declared that anyone can use the code. They still have ownership but not the proprietary kind of ownership
But its not lnk but an executable that needs to be excecuted manually?