What’s the 411 on steamunlocked ? Just malware ? Can we just get the cracks like in the old days ?

That is incorrect. Partial seeding means they seed the part they downloaded, end of story. There are no downsides.

6gb sas is regularly found for 30-40$. 80$ for 12gb sounds reasonnable. And you’ll save 50% power per GB

I’m leaving space for the possibility that some of them aren’t run by the average zero sum idiots that plague the internet and real life. But probably yes, all private trackers I’ve wasted my time joining, have been this kind of stupid shit, resource and time wasting shit.

Public trackers are far far superior and the only source of torrents to grace my seedboxes.

Trackers that make users do that are plainly scams. Probably run by the mpaa to slow down piracy.

It creates a deadlock where nobody dowloads and nobody uploads. 500 seeds terabytes wasted, sitting with idle internet connections, nobody downloading.

They are decrepit dinosaurs killing grandmas for an industry that died 10 years ago. A violent hate machine running on fumes that must be destroyed for humanity’s sake.

This time the glove come off from the get go. DIE MPAA FREAKS !

The MPAA is a terrorist organisation and must be stopped with extreme prejudice.

Ah that makes sense, they were competing for the same demographic for their recruitment efforts.

Can you back that up ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Salvation_Army#Biased_History

Email server and password vault This is something that should be a physical object in your own home. And it should be only that (ok, maybe include a notes and calendar app but keep it simple, stupid)

It seemed to select more than just the ad. That’s why I wanted to report it rather than break my filters.

Thanks !

Magnet link ? And maybe physical address of their head office, for sending them pre-paid pizzas as thank yous ?

Thank you for your work or this reply. However I do not believe a multireddit analog can solve this issue. As it would not be the default, anyone “escaping” with a multireddit would still find themselves invisible to the larger community who does not use it or even know multicommunities exist or remember to use it for that specific community.

Only a system that shows it all, that user then filter out with shared blacklists, can break the tyranny of moderators.

It becomes a much more acceptable tyranny of the majority, which is only optionnally followed by members.

Thank you for making it clear this is a conscious design decision. I very much disagree with it. Multicommunities, like multireddit do not adress this terrible problem. I think lemmy is now doomed to repeat reddit’s mistake. Hopefully in 10-15 years the lemmy successor will see the light about this problem.

That ends up like the multireddit suggestion. You might have a modded view of the lemmyverse where can see the obscure posts on 10 user instances.

But most of the lemmy population will still have the default view.

So in effect, these post are not visible to most users and they don’t becone culturally relevant. It is like they don’t exist and the only community is the “big one” plus maybe a 2nd one with only the refuse from the 1st.

The problem is communities could just as easily walk away from reddit as they do lemmy. Yet they don’t. Lemmy has the same issue with critical mass of users.

The communities should be fediverse wide, not under the grips on one mod team.

Lemmygrad still can send all the kulaks to the gulags. But only when the discussion happening inside their hard drive. Aka “I take my ball and go home”

They do not get to silence the rest of the fediverse/c/books

This isn’t the first time I have proposed this, but the pushback leads me to believe the owners do not want to relinquish power to the users. Lemmy it seems, is a community for owners. The interests of instance owners and their delegates come first.

I think we will need the digg & reddit story to play out all over again so that in 10-15 years the next exodus out of lemmy might lead us somewhere we can actually be free.

If it requires the owner’s consent, it defeats the purposeof my proposal.

It is expressly to disempower the owners in favour of the users.