Absolutely!
If anyone is interested here’s a great thread on it
Absolutely!
If anyone is interested here’s a great thread on it
Just be cautious when moving or backing up the files, things like rsync and bakula have specific flags needed to preserve symlinks.
Checkout plexamp as your client if you use plex
Great guide. However the AI generated network engineer in that article is hilarious
You can however run any LXC which you can definitely do natively.
I’ll sit here and wait for the jellyfin fans to find this comment.
XBMC became Kodi, you can still get that 10ft UI and it integrates with local media files like ripped DVDs and Blu-ray, or it’ll interop with any streaming service, or it’ll interop with high seas URLs.
That gave way to Plex, which is a webapp to host your local media, which has grown very large and is out of favor. Jellyfin and others have taken up the mantel.
In-between the two are the *arr suites of software which automate file sharing.
It’s a rabbit hole if you’re interested. Feel free to google any of these names and you’ll find a glut of how to articles online.
Where’s that in the documentation?
Correct, so when I post my song I created to Funkwhale, it’s then federated across the fediverse, living on other servers and able to be downloaded.
Let’s say I use the wikimedia license and allow reproduction of my music as long as I’m credited.
Someone in the fediverse likes my song and they download it. Then use it in their licensed DRM enabled media and give me no credit.
Who then protects my license and attribution rights beside myself? Does this open up others in the fediverse who hosted my media and allowed download to suit? The courts that would hear the case are unlikely to provide a distinction between the user who stole my media and those hosting it.
What prevents Funkwhale from charging a fee for their streaming app and profiting from my song and cutting me out of profit share? Which is exactly what digital distributors do all the time.
How does Funkwhale prevent the upload and sharing of licensed music by unlicensed parties?
None of this is referenced in the documentation or ad copy on the site.
I’ve seen funkwhale posted here multiple times, and these questions are never addressed.
That’s fair enough, so who handles licensing. How do you protect the copy left aspect of your music? How do you prevent your work from being freebooted?
The publishing referenced in the ad copy. There’s no talk of how licensing is handled or who hosts what where. Just because it starts off as OSS and self hosted does not mean it stays that way.
What if we added a P2P element so we could share our music and own it instead of streaming it? Oh wait, that’s soulseek.
Who keeps posting this? This feels inches away from a monetized subscription service.
You have a permissions issue with pg_logical/snapshots": Permission denied. Check that your volumes exist in /var/lib/docker/container (or something close) and that the user running docker can create a test file in the local directory (likely a db directory in the docker root)
What’s your docker-compose.yml look like? Especially any volume mounts
Kind of, yeah. That’s why I replied with it.
Their pricing structure doesn’t affect what I have hosted and I’m selfhosting email in dockermail. My whois is still anonymized how I like.
GDRP and anonymous hosting. Pretty great.
That makes more sense.
Use rclone