This might shock you but cars where open source for years. Did you think those super detailed shop manuals anyone could buy where not intended to be used to work on the car? How about the massive aftermarket and any and all hot rods? This idea that you can’t fuck with you own stuff because its got a computer in it for “safety” is relatively new. Does no one else remember hooking a laptop up to the old ECUs and modifying how the engine works?
https://www.securityweek.com/16-car-makers-and-their-vehicles-hacked-telematics-apis-infrastructure/
Here is a thing I found after a simple google search. Its not even a good article but hey I spent more time typing this then finding it…
Well it is a computer that people own (even if it is in a car), and at least one person will want to mess with that computer.
Remind me again what assumptions you can make about software integrity if the hardware it runs on is in full possession of a known attacker?
Remember when browsers just browsed…
Hate to tell you this here but Opera is also chrome based…
To be helpful here is a list of all the browsers (according to Wikipedia anyway) that are actually just three chromes in a trench coat.
Arc
Amazon Silk
Avast Secure Browser developed by Avast
Blisk
Brave
Carbonyl
CodeWeavers
Comodo Dragon
Cốc Cốc
Epic Browser
Falkon
Microsoft Edge
Naver Whale
Opera
Qihoo 360 Secure Browser
qutebrowser
Samsung Internet
Sleipnir
Slimjet:
SRWare Iron
ungoogled-chromium
Vivaldi
Yandex Browser
We need more browser options, not just Firefox and 20 versions of chrome.
The issue is normalizing the concept that you do not get to control what you paid for. Responsibility has not changed, you can drive your car into a crowded park and would still be guilty of it regardless of how stock it is. If you mod your stuff to be dangerous that would be a crime. In this case would you say that remote starting your car from your phone somehow is a public safety issue? At least if you jailbroke it to work on your own network?