Did you even bother to consult a dictionary before you wrote up this silly gatekeeping nonsense?
There is nothing in the definition of civil disobedience that says it needs to be public.
There is nothing that say we have to openly challenge the authorities.
There is nothing that says we have to get the medias attention.
Where does this expectation come from?
I did not commission these works.
They created their art without a contract between them and I.
Their ability to recover their cost is not my responsibility.
Their right to obtain a profit is capitalist nonsense.
The force of government injecting a contract doesn’t create a moral obligation.
So where does this moral obligation come from?
Is there some religious text indicating the divinity of copyright?
The concept was created from nothing.
Plex with Apple TVs. This requires a lot of transcoding but I have dedicated hardware.
I’ve tried many alternatives over many years but they all eventually annoy me. I’ve been doing this long enough to know eventually something better than Plex will come along but that day has yet to come.
I don’t have any streaming services. They are all terrible and I prefer to put that money towards more hardware, mostly hard drives since my library is of the data hoarding style, ever increasing.
My setup is entirely automated via various watch lists.
IMDb watch lists and Plex watchlists as well as various lists setup to retrieve based on cast / director involvement that feed into Radarr and Sonarr allow titles to be added from my phone.
The added benefit of a my automation setup is that I can lose a hard drive and the system will self heal.
Takes one to know one!
I am going to assume every downvote on your accurate fact based statement is from men who refer to women as females.
Real men know how terrible those betas treat women.
Ok, he was distributing.
That’s not a the same as a torrent.
In the end he got three weeks. 5 million downloads, three weeks.
They control us with fear. You spread the fear.
Fuck copyright and anyone that supports it.
Show me someone who has been criminally charged for sharing copyright content without a profit motive.
Piracy isn’t a crime, it’s a civil concern.
“Media attention” doesn’t appear on your quote nor the entitreity of that Wikipedia article.
The other two are merely your personal interpretation of how you split the phrase “professed refusal”
Professed can as easily be satisfied by going on a piracy forum and declaring your allegiance to the movement.
Refusal is what piracy is. The act of ignoring copyright law, is the refusal.
“I do not agree with copyright law and will not be restricted by it” – This statement satisfies “professed refusal”
I do not have to petition my senator.
I don’t have to stand on a street corner with a sign.
I will take it further and claim that you or anyone else adding arbitrary rules to how one must practice civil disobedience is antithetical to civil disobedience.