![](https://kbin.melroy.org/media/14/36/1436544f379b170dbb63e499734bf582a5c48a6051ea7dce3a1cb6a8c4e408c5.webp)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
They do provide releases; uYou is a tweak
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0
They do provide releases; uYou is a tweak
That has a lot less features, unfortunately. Like Enhanced recently added a copy video to timestamp. Enhanced just has more active development
endeavourOS
news waits for no one
Unless it can support the plugins already there (which I doubt… mono doesn’t mean we can straight up run DLLs, right?), I’d have to hope it stumbles into an incredible ecosystem. Thanks for the find, I’ll be looking out for it. We finally might have one people’d be content using. Now I’m wondering if/when I finally get enough motivation to start making a coverflow or a lyrics-scroll plugin, should I develop for Amarok or Fooyin?
We also used to have Guarapirangua and DeaDBeeF. G ran out of steam, and D decided to fuck over Russian-language users cuz “they country war so they people bad!”, angering many plugin developers besides making me morally uncontent with what future decisions they’d make.
god i hate words
Sugar, from One Laptop Per Child. it has like an entirely different UI paradigm or something, haven’t tried it
The GFW blocks a lot more than just illegal movie sites
Curious, do you have some extension that makes Firefox support #:~:text?
Could you provide an example: Ideally a copyleft one
Ah yes, Google funding a browser to become their default search engine precludes using it
IMO The product is the most important along with being FOSS. You can always use a configured fork without Google funding
FOSS was created as a compromise between the FSF and the OSI, and the latter’s Open Source Definition includes this:
Free redistribution: The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.
Keep in mind that the OSI was made for the purposes of popularizing the term “open source”, which was created because some wanted it to be more pragmatic than political. This is a consensus.
I’d understand if you said that the FSF feels like communism, but how the heck is that specific philosophy in support of selling FOSS software communism?
I also wonder which forks these are (should probably ask maintainers), but I do not get your point about Floorp or the three forks in the screenshot at all.
why are they still up if they’re breaking license?
Because they didn’t. Code was previously up under MPL, a permissive license
Does your answer apply to fediverse server owners (eg Mastodon, Lemmy) whose premise is hosting an opinionated and branded instance
I haven’t seen an instance that claims it doesn’t use e.g. Lemmy when it’s using it.
Commercial use is use
It’s also the most-accepted one.
You think a malicious fork that only changed the branding would openly fork it on GitHub?
Where the heck did you get “I want to get paid”?
It just updated a month ago buddy. uYou is the tweak