• debanqued@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t watch videos but I will say that my biggest problem with the iME is not the security issue, but the anti-consumer aspect. Intel decided non-corporate consumers (who do not want or benefit from iME) can be disregarded marginalized. So disabling iME is insufficient and misses the problem.

    The answer is to boycott iME CPUs. I never bought an intel CPU after 2008. I write this comment from a 16 year old PC just fine. I have pulled some more recent hardware out of dumpsters, ensuring I do not support anti-consumer products.

    • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Damn, running such an old CPU must be a total pain. Its crazy that the damn NSA needed to force Intel, but if you can disable it that sounds kinda okay.

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Isn’t this just an ad for their custom laptops? There isn’t really that much talk about Intel ME, which is a shame.

        • debanqued@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          iME can be “disabled” if you go along with all the hand-waving. The nuts and bolts of it is that the ME /must/ execute when powering on the CPU, but then there is a moment in the boot sequence in which it can be disabled. For some people, that’s good enough.