I’m curious as to why someone would need to do that short of having a bunch of users and a small office at home. Or maybe managing the family’s computers is easier that way?

I was considering a domain controller (biased towards linux since most servers/VMs are linux) but right now, for the homelab, it just seems like a shiny new toy to play with rather than something that can make life easier/more secure. There’s also the problem of HA and being locked out of your computer if the DC is down.

Tell me why you’re running it and the setup you’ve got that makes having a DC worth it.

Thanks!

  • Godort@lemm.eeEnglish
    3·
    9 months ago

    I agree that for this size of network AD is definitely not something you want to deal with unless you want to learn how it works.

    However, I’m not sure it really increases attack vectors to have it running, outside of the fact that it’s a new network service on the LAN. The out of the box default configuration is not bad these days, security-wise

    • Unforeseen@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      4·
      9 months ago

      The attack vectors I’m thinking of just come from the inherent complexity and centralization. I’m just considering the amount of damage that can be done with a compromised DA account for example vs a non directory environment.

      It’s complicated. Done right it can be more secure, not done right it’s less secure.

      I also only get brought in for problems for the last however many years, so I’m probaby a bit biased at this point haha.

      I have had to tell companies they are going to have to rebuild thier AD from scratch because they didn’t know what thier DSRM password was (usually after a ransomware attack). These are the sort of hassles I think about vs non AD.