Today FUTO released an application called Grayjay for Android-based mobile phones. Louis Rossmann introduced the application in a video (YouTube link). Grayjay as an application is very promising, but there is one point I take issue with: Grayjay is not an Open Source application. In the video Louis explains his reason behind the custom license, and while I do agree with his reason, I strong disagree with his method. In this post I will explain what Open Source means, how Grayjay does not meet the criteria, why this is an issue, and how it can be solved.

  • amki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Do you not see the contradiction in this statement? Where do you find the line of what is stealing and “working as intented”?

    If you redistribute someone else’s open source code as open source but change nothing why would I get it from you and not the original developer? There is no incentive and no reward to “steal”.

    If you make enough changes to create additional value I might and then it is “working as intended”